by Lucius Livius Seneca » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:45 pm
L. Livius mag. C. Florio sal.
Since there is no Latin qualification required to serve as magistri, you are right, C. Flori, in that they may lack the expertise to evaluate errors themselves. I am hesitant, however, to grant any and every grammaticus (assuming such a position is approved by the College) the authority to issue monita, lest a swarm of admonishing "experts" descend upon an unsuspecting public. Perhaps the magistri refer the question to the consilium grammaticorum, who then respond with their opinion, to be communicated by the magistri to the erring officials? That way the lines of communication remain clear: officialdom↔magistri↔grammatici.
As for collegiate nomenclature, historically the format was a plural genitive of members (e.g., Collegium Vinariorum "College of Vinters," Collegium Pistorum "College of Bakers," etc.). Unfortunately, the College membership rejected the idea that we be an organization of professionals, and so Collegium Grammaticorum would be a misnomer, describing a minority of the actual members. For the philosophers, however, Collegium Philosophorum wouldn't be unreasonable.
Vale.