-- An important topic. I think Varro’s proposal will touch upon this. ---
Of course, my English is not my native language, but I do not understand how the awards to the governors and Lustrum that Varron writes about are related to the questions that I speak about? We need to figure out which of the governors is still working, who is already inactive. Need to get reports. Although in fact, I would have removed all governors from their posts, because in their time frame they have not done anything. And some, like you Brutus, I would remove from the post with a negative characteristic, because in some provinces the provincial work was never carried out, the governors simply held their posts. By the way, if you suddenly start talking about Severus, don’t think that I have double standards, I’m also strict towards him, in my opinion, you can also remove him from the post of governor, he has long been busy with another direction of reconstruction, like almost all our province.
And about the CDR ... well, how to say. You can’t do anything for years, I decided to remind you of your obligations. Of course, you can distort my words and say that I am talking about the lustrum, but no, this is not so. I'm talking about the direction as a whole, which you abandoned and thought that no one would notice.))))
--- What is your proposal here? ---
Allocate money, hire a translator, let him translate the main content, place translations so that Russian-speaking people can fully access basic information and regulatory documents.
--- This was discussed at prior senate meetings. This would require an amendment to our bylaws. So something for the Comitia Curiata to approve. ---
Is that the Comitia Curiata where you have the most votes? You who do not like this idea? Well, now I'm sure that if the Comitia Curiata considers this, not the Senate, then they will definitely make a positive decision. It's sarcasm. I already know that the Comitia Curiata will not accept it, because the decision of the CC is your decision and it is negative. By the way, if before the Senate considered this issue, why should the Comitia Curiata consider it now?))))))
--- This fell through when the citizen spearheading this resigned. At the moment I have been working on offering citizenship rings. We will discuss this at the meeting. ---
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2341&hilit=coin+productionThere is such a thing. When you ran away for a year, in your absence, the Republic continued to exist, and people communicated with each other. I advise you to read this topic. So I don’t see the problem that the Senate will discuss both coins and rings. Or is the Senate now discussing only the products that you represent?
--- This was never the case. The account was previously accessible to both myself and a co-lictors Victor and Hostilia.
Today all the LCMs have access. Account access was updated this spring. ---
Well, of course. This was never a problem for you, but it was a constant problem for all of us, for the Republic, when you ran away, your wife naturally disappeared, and Victor left. Oh yes, well, that’s not a thing for you, because you don’t know about our problems, you weren’t there.
If this were not a problem, then such topics would not appear:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2375So what? Who has access to the account now? They definitely won’t disappear, how did you do it? Can still discuss this issue? And then suddenly someone will again run away from the Republic and history will repeat itself))))
--- I only became aware of the issue this spring. I did not build the elections system. Laenas did. We had some difficulty connecting to discuss this matter. No ones rights were violated as elections can be held by any polling system. And all required magistrates had access to citizen contact info at all times. ---
Why am I hearing about this just now? Maybe it was worth saying about this two years ago? Besides, what does Laenas have to do with it? It was not Laenas who was the officially designated maintenance person. You still hold this position. Therefore, references to Laenas look ridiculous. If you are not able to solve the problem, then why are you holding this position again? If something doesn’t work out, will you dump everything on Laenas again? Isn't it convenient to shift your responsibility to another person?
--- No ones rights were violated as elections can be held by any polling system. And all required magistrates had access to citizen contact info at all times. ---
Oh yes, I forgot, you’re an authoritarian ruler, now you decide whether there was a violation of rights or not!))) It seems to me that these two know better whether their rights are violated or not. So they believe that their rights are violated, because people who find themselves in their problem situation, and whose rights were spit on by people like you, they still better know if their rights were violated or not.
--- See the CC meeting minutes on the reasons for this. If you have an alternate proposal please make it. ---
Oh yes, I saw how you made decisions, without analysis, discussion, consultation ... and you don’t think, Brutus, that it is because of this that I demand a public discussion in the Senate, regarding HOW and WHY you made that decision? And I do not propose, I demand this discussion, I want everyone to know your motives, how responsibly you approached these issues, how you thought about the consequences, expediency.